1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. COTTON v. GERACI
 

COTTON v. GERACI

Case No. 18cv2751-GPC(MDD).

DARRYL COTTON, an individual; JOSE HURTADO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. LARRY GERACI, an individual; REBECCA BERRY a/k/a REBECCA ANN BERRY RUNYAN, an individual; MICHAEL R. WEINSTEIN, an individual; SCOTT TOOTHACRE, an individual; FERRIS & BRITTON APC, a California corporation; GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual; AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP APC, a California corporation; SEAN MILLER, an individual; FINCH THORTON & BAIRD, a limited liability partnership; DAVID DEMIAN, an individual; ADAM WITT, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

May 14, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darryl Cotton, an individual & Joe Hurtado, an individual, Plaintiffs, represented by Jacob Austin , The Law Office of Jacob Austin.

Larry Geraci, an individual & Rebecca Berry, an individual, Defendants, represented by James D. Crosby , James D. Crosby, Attorney at Law.

Michael R. Weinstein, an individual, Scott Toothacre, an individual & Ferris & Britton APC, a California corporation, Defendants, represented by Eric R. Deitz , Gordon & Rees LLP & Tatiana Dupuy , Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani.

Gina M. Austin, an individual & Austin Legal Group APC, a California corporation, Defendants, represented by Douglas A. Pettit , Pettit Kohn Ingrassia & Lutz PC & Julia Dalzell .

Finch Thorton & Baird, a limited liability partnership, David Demian, an individual & Adam Witt, an individual, Defendants, represented by Tim Jude Vanden Heuvel , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP.

ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT

[Dkt. Nos. 18, 20, 21.]

Before the Court are Defendants Finch Thornton & Baird LLP, David Demian and Adam Witt's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, (Dkt. No. 18...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases