DAVIS v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.

Case No. 1:19-cv-00268 LJO JLT.

BRIAN K. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

May 10, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian K. Davis, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Marwan Rocco Daher , Sulaiman Law Group, Ltd., pro hac vice & Nicholas Michal Wajda , Wajda Law Group, APC.

Convergent Outsourcing, Inc., Defendant, represented by Timothy P. Johnson , Law Offices Of Timothy P. Johnson.


ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR HIS FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THIS ACTION

Despite that the time for the defendant to respond to this action has passed, the plaintiff has not sought default or default judgment. Thus, the Court ORDERS:

1.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases