1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 380 F.Supp.3d
  5. 380 F.Supp.3d 1178 (2019)
 

BLOCKER v. CONOCOPHILLIPS CO.

Case No. CIV-17-248-G.

380 F.Supp.3d 1178 (2019)

James BLOCKER and Jami Blocker, husband and wife, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

Signed May 6, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 240 Torts to Land
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Corey A. Neller, Mark D. Coldiron, Patrick R. Pearce, Jr., Stephen L. Jantzen, Phillip G. Whaley, Stephen C. Gelnar, Ryan Whaley Coldiron Shandy PC, Patrick M. Ryan, Ryan Whaley Coldiron Jantzen Peters & Webber PLLC, Oklahoma City, OK, Robert R. Redwine, Bethany Law Center, Bethany, OK, for Plaintiffs.

Amy M. Stipe, Ellen A. Adams, Jay P. Walters, John M. Krattiger, Rob F. Robertson, Gable & Gotwals, Oklahoma City, OK, Deborah D. Kuchler, Kuchler Polk Weiner LLC, New Orleans, LA, Scott R. Rowland, Terry D. Ragsdale, Gable & Gotwals, Tulsa, OK, for Defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant ConocoPhillips Company's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 131) filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In its Motion, Defendant seeks summary adjudication of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases