ESPINOZA v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.

Case No. 3:18-cv-02090-H-MDD.

GUILLERMO ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. California.

May 2, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 0227(b)(3)
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 0227(b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Guillermo Espinoza, Plaintiff, represented by Ahren A. Tiller , BLC Law Center, APC.

Capital One, N.A., Defendant, represented by Stacy Heather Rubin , Ballard Spahr LLP.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ADD PARTIES

[Doc. No. 18]

On March 25, 2019, Plaintiff Guillermo Espinoza filed a motion for leave to file a first amended complaint and add new parties pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) and 20. (Doc. No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases