1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. I.F. EX REL. SKINNER v. CITY OF VALLEJO
 

I.F. EX REL. SKINNER v. CITY OF VALLEJO

No. 2:18-cv-00673-JAM-CKD.

I.F., by and through her guardian ad litem SHASTA SKINNER, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL FOSTER; R.F., by and through his guardian ad litem SHENA BATTEN, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent RONELL FOSTER; PAULA McGOWAN, individually; and RONELL FOSTER, SR., individually. Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF VALLEJO, a municipal corporation; RYAN McMAHON, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the CITY OF VALLEJO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive. Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

April 30, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I.F., individually and as successor-in-interest by and through her guardian ad litem Shasta Skinner, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent Ronell Foster & Ronell Foster, Sr., Plaintiffs, represented by Adante Pointer , Law Offices of John L. Burris, John L. Burris , Law Offices of John L. Burris, Patrick Matthew Buelna , Law Offices of John Burris, Teresa Denise Allen , Haddad & Sherwin LLP, Julia Sherwin , Haddad & Sherwin, LLP, Maya Melissa Sorensen , Haddad & Sherwin & Michael Joseph Haddad , Haddad & Sherwin, LLP.

R.F., individually and as successor-in-interest by and through her guardian ad litem Shena Batten, individually and as successor-in-interest to Decedent Ronell Foster & Paula McGowan, Plaintiffs, represented by Adante Pointer , Law Offices of John L. Burris, John L. Burris , Law Offices of John L. Burris, Patrick Matthew Buelna , Law Offices of John Burris & Maya Melissa Sorensen , Haddad & Sherwin.

City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation & Ryan McMahon, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Vallejo, Defendants, represented by Timothy R. Smyth , Office of the City Attorney.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

The parties respectfully request that the Court modify the case management and trial dates as follows:

Case Event Current Date Proposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases