GARMON CORPORATION v. HEALTHYPETS, INC.

Case No. 5:18-cv-809-ODW(SHKx).

THE GARMON CORPORATION, a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. HEALTHYPETS, INC., a California corporation; MANDEEP GHUMMAN, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

April 25, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Garmon Corporation, a California corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Brianna M. Skelly , Taft Stettinius and Hollister LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel R. Saeedi , Taft Stettlinius and Hollister LLP, pro hac vice, John M. Riccione , Taft Stettinius and Hollister LLP, pro hac vice, M. Laurie Murphy , Valensi Rose PLC & Stephen F. Moeller , Valensi Rose PLC.

HealthyPets, Inc., a California corporation & Mandeep Ghumann, Defendants, represented by Richard C. Vasquez , Vasquez Benisek and Lindgren LLP, William C. Milks, III , Law Office of William Milks III & Jeffrey T. Lindgren , Vasquez Benisek and Lindgren LLP.

Mandeep Ghumann & HealthyPets, Inc., a California corporation, Counter Claimants, represented by Richard C. Vasquez , Vasquez Benisek and Lindgren LLP, Jeffrey T. Lindgren , Vasquez Benisek and Lindgren LLP & William C. Milks, III , Law Office of William Milks III.

The Garmon Corporation, a California corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Brianna M. Skelly , Taft Stettinius and Hollister LLP, Daniel R. Saeedi , Taft Stettlinius and Hollister LLP, John M. Riccione , Taft Stettinius and Hollister LLP, M. Laurie Murphy , Valensi Rose PLC & Stephen F. Moeller , Valensi Rose PLC.

Mandeep Ghumann & HealthyPets, Inc., a California corporation, Counter Defendants, represented by Richard C. Vasquez , Vasquez Benisek and Lindgren LLP, Jeffrey T. Lindgren , Vasquez Benisek and Lindgren LLP & William C. Milks, III , Law Office of William Milks III.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNCONTESTED MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT CLAIM OF THE COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, AND DAMAGES [101]

Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (ECF No. 101) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases