KING v. CURTIS

Case No. 1:14-cv-403.

MADISON KING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CHAD CURTIS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

March 11, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Madison King, plaintiff, represented by Douglas Edan Fierberg , The Fierberg National Law Group PLLC, Monica Helen Beck , The Fierberg National Law Group PLLC & Jonathon N. Fazzola , The Fierberg National Law Group PLLC.

Chad Curtis, defendant, pro se.

Candace Curtis, respondent, represented by Benjamin Martin White , White Law Firm, PLC.

Lakewood Public Schools, Lakewood Public Schools Board of Education & Unknown Part(y)(ies), named as James Roes 1-10, third-party plaintiffs, represented by Jennifer Kay Starlin , Thrun Law Firm PC & Robert A. Dietzel , Thrun Law Firm PC.


OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Candace Curtis' Objections (ECF No. 449) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 434). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3), the Court has performed de novo consideration of those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases