1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. UNILOC USA, INC. v. APPLE, INC.
 

UNILOC USA, INC. v. APPLE, INC.

Case No. 18-CV-00357-LHK.

UNILOC USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

March 11, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Uniloc USA, Inc. & UNILOC Luxembourg S.A., Plaintiffs, represented by Paul J. Hayes , Prince Lobel Tye, Aaron Seth Jacobs , Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Anthony Michael Vecchione , Nelson Bumgardner Albritton P.C., Daniel McGonagle , Prince Lobel Tye, pro hac vice, Dean G. Bostock , Pince Lobel Tye LLP, pro hac vice, James John Foster , Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Jonathan R. DeBlois , Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Kevin Gannon , Prince Lobel Tye, Michael James Ercolini , Prince Lobel Tye, Robert R. Gilman , Prince Lobel Tye & Edward R. Nelson, III , Nelson Bumgardner PC.

Apple, Inc., Defendant, represented by Douglas Jordan Winnard , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan and Baum LLP, Emma Christine Ross , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan and Baum LLP, pro hac vice, Michael Thomas Pieja , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP, Alan E. Littmann , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP, pro hac vice, Andrew John Rima , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan and Baum LLP, pro hac vice, Emma C. Neff , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP, pro hac vice, Harry Lee Gillam, Jr. , Gillam & Smith LLP, Jennifer Laura Greenblatt , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan and Baum, Jennifer Laura Greenblatt , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan and Baum, pro hac vice, Kenneth Frederick Baum , Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum LLP & Melissa Richards Smith , Gillam & Smith, LLP.

ORDER DENYING UNILOC'S MOTION TO SEVER AND LIFT STAY

Re: Dkt. No. 152

On April 30, 2018, the Court stayed the instant action pending final resolution "of all pending IPR proceedings, including appeals." ECF No. 144 at 6. At the time, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB") had not yet decided whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases