1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MULL v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN
 

MULL v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN

Case No. LA CV 12-06693-VBF.

LENAI MULL, CARSON MULL, NORMAN MULL, and DANIELLE MULL, Plaintiffs, v. MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN and BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

March 7, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lenai Mull, Danielle Mull, appointed Guardian Ad Litem for Carson Mull, Norman Mull & C Mull, as Plaintiff and Danielle Mull is Appointed Guardian ad Litem for C Mull, Plaintiffs, represented by Daniel E. Wilcoxen , Wilcoxen Callaham LLP & Donald M. DeCamara , Donald M. de Camara Law Offices.

Motion Picture Industry Health Plan & Board of Directors of Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Defendants, represented by Michael Rasalan Odoca , Wohlmer Kaplon Cutler Halford and Rosenfeld, Elizabeth Rosenfeld , Wohlner Kaplon Cutler Halford and Rosenfeld & Kathryn Jane Halford , Wohlner Kaplon Cutler Halford and Rosenfeld.

FINAL JUDGMENT

Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of both defendants and against all plaintiffs on the claims in the first amended complaint. IT IS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases