YOLANY PADILLA, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 6, 2019.
March 6, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Yolany Padilla, Ibis Guzman, Blanca Orantes & Baltazar Vasquez, Plaintiffs, represented by Kristin Macleod-Ball, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, pro hac vice, Leila Kang, NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT, Matt Adams, NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT, Trina Realmuto, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, pro hac vice & Aaron Korthuis, NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT.
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, also known as ICE, US Department of Homeland Security, also known as DHS, US Customs and Border Protection, also known as CBP, United StatesCitizenship and Immigration Services, also known as USCIS, Thomas Homan, Acting Director of ICE, Kirstjen M Nielsen, Secretary of DHS, Kevin K. McAleenan, Acting Commissioner of CBP, L Francis Cissna, Director of USCIS, Marc J Moore, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, United States Attorney General, Lowell Clark, Warden of the Norwest Detention Center in Tacoma, Charles Ingram, Warden of the Federal Detention Center in SeaTac, Washington & David Shinn, Warden of the Federal Correctional Institute in Victorville, CA, Defendants, represented by Joseph A. Darrow, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Lauren C. Bingham, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE & Sarah S. Wilson, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
James Janecka, Warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility, Defendant, represented by Sarah S. Wilson, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINES
MARSHA J. PECHMAN, District Judge.
The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed Defendants' Motion for Relief from Deadlines (Dkt. No. 83); Plaintiffs' Response (Dkt. No. 84); Defendants' Reply (Dkt. No. 86); and all attached declarations and exhibits, and relevant portions of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
