ANTHONY OLIVER, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF POOLER, a public entity; CITY OF SAVANNAH, a public entity; CITY OF BLOOMINGDALE, a public entity; STATE OF GEORGIA, a state municipality; NATHAN DEAL, in his official capacity as Governor; CHARLES DAVIS, in his individual capacity; ADAM WILLIS, in his individual capacity; MATT LIBBY, in his individual and official capacity; ASHLEY BROWN, individual and official capacity; MARK REVENEW, in his individual an official capacity; BLAIR JEFFCOAT, in his individual and official capacity; DOES 1-10, inclusive; CITY OF PORT WENTWORTH, a public municipality; and ADRIAN GATES, in his individual capacity; Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 28, 2019.
February 28, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Anthony Oliver, an individual, Plaintiff, pro se.
City of Pooler, a public entity, City of Bloomingdale, a public entity, Charles Davis, in his individual capacity, Adam Willis, in his individual capacity, Matt Libby, in his individual and official capacity, Ashley Brown, individual and official capacity, Blair Jeffcoat, in his individual and official capacity & City of Port Wentworth, a public municipality, Defendants, represented by Patrick T. O'Connor , Oliver Maner, LLP & Jacob D. Massee , Oliver Maner, LLP.
City of Savannah, a public entity, Mark Revenew, in his individual and official capacity & Adrian Gates, in his individual capacity, Defendants, represented by Malcolm Mackenzie, III , Weiner, Shearouse, Weitz, Greenberg & Shawe, LLP & Anthony Robert Casella , Weiner, Shearouse, Weitz, Greenberg & Shawe, LLP.
State of Georgia, a state municipality & Nathan Deal, in his official capacity as Governor, Defendants, represented by Joshua K. Brooks , Dept. of Law.
ORDER
WILLIAM T. MOORE, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 53), to which objections have been filed (Doc. 55). After a careful de novo review of the record, the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion in this case. Plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
