SNAP! MOBILE, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
PAUL CROGHAN, Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
February 22, 2019.
February 22, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b)
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1836(b) - Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Snap! Mobile, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Lawrence R. Cock , CFL Law Group, LLP, pro hac vice, Jack M. Lovejoy , CFL Law Group, LLP, pro hac vice & Alan Heimlich , Attorney at Law.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH PREJUDICE, GRANTING IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE; GRANTING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 32
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Snap! Mobile, Inc.'s ("Snap") motion to strike the affirmative defenses and to dismiss the counterclaims...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.