HICKS v. FRITO-LAY, INC.

No. 4:17CV00330 JLH.

DAVID HICKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC.; and ROLLING FRITO-LAY SALES, LP, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

February 11, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Hicks, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel D. Ford , Sanford Law Firm & Joshua Sanford , Sanford Law Firm.

Frito-Lay Inc & Rolling Frito-Lay Sales LP, Defendants, represented by Ashley T. Hirano , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, & Hampton LLP, pro hac vice, Daniel F. De La Cruz , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, & Hampton LLP, pro hac vice, Samantha D. Hardy , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, & Hampton LLP, pro hac vice, Gregory James Northen , Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C. & J. Bruce Cross , Cross, Gunter, Witherspoon & Galchus, P.C..


ORDER

The parties have filed a joint motion for approval of the FLSA release and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice. They have also provided a copy of the settlement agreement under seal, and the Court has reviewed it. The settlement agreement is the product of contested litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases