1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MURRAY v. SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC.
 

MURRAY v. SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC.

Case No. 1:18-CV-01492-LJO-SKO.

RODERICK MURRAY an individual, on behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. SCELZI ENTERPRISES, INC, a California corporation, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

February 6, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 790 Labor: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick Murray, an individual, on behalf of the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Jonathan Melmed , Melmed Law Group P.C. & Craig Justin Ackermann , Ackermann & Tilajef, PC.

Scelzi Enterprises, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant, represented by Andrew Hoon Woo , Littler Mendelson PC.

ORDER CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND DATE BY WHICH DEFENDANT IS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

(Doc. 8)

ORDER

Base on the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that

1) The time for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases