SILLAS v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Case No. CV17-08691-FMO (AFMx).

MIGUEL SILLAS, MARIA SILLAS, and JOSE SILLAS, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation; EDGAR MEJIA, MATTHEW MENDEZ, HAINER HERNANDEZ, MICHAEL MARINO, VINCENZO AVERAIMO, ALEX FRANCO, DANIEL HUGHES, JOSE TEJEDA, JOHN PADILLA, JEREMY MASSEY, DANIEL KAMINSKI, ARSHAVIR SHALDJIAN, RYAN SCHATZ, PATRICK FOREMAN, RODOLFO RODRIGUEZ, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

January 29, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jose Sillas, Maria Sillas & Miguel Sillas, Plaintiffs, represented by Diane H. Bang , Spertus Landes and Umhofer LLP, Elizabeth J. Lee , Spertus Landes and Umhofer LLP, James Anthony King , Spertus Landes and Umhofer LLP, James W. Spertus , Spertus Landes and Umhofer LLP, John Hanusz , Spertus Landes and Umhofer LLP & Samuel A. Josephs , Spertus Landes and Umhofer LLP.

City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, Hainer Hernandez, an individual, Michael Marino, an individual, Vincenzo Averaimo, an individual, Alex Franco, an individual, Jose Tejeda, John Padilla, an individual, Jeremy Massey, an individual, Daniel Kaminski, an individual, Ryan Schatz, an individual, Patrick Foreman, an individual & Rodolfo Rodriguez, an individual, Defendants, represented by Laura E. Inlow , Collinson Daehnke Inlow and Greco & Lisa W. Lee , Los Angeles City Attorneys Office.

Edgar Mejia, an individual, Matthew Mendez, an individual, Daniel Hughes, an individual & Officer Arshavir Shaldjian, an individual, Defendants, represented by Jessica Patrice Gomez , Collinson Daehnke Inlow and Greco, Laura E. Inlow , Collinson Daehnke Inlow and Greco & Lisa W. Lee , Los Angeles City Attorneys Office.


CERTIFICATION OF FACTS AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY LIZETTE MADERA SILLAS SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT

Nonparty Lizette Madera Sillas ("Madera Sillas") has failed to appear for a deposition and failed to appear in Court to address why she should not be held in contempt for her failure to appear...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases