1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 357 F.Supp.3d
  5. 357 F.Supp.3d 1189 (2019)
 

IN RE EQUIFAX INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION FILE NO. 17-CV-3463-TWT.

357 F.Supp.3d 1189 (2019)

IN RE EQUIFAX INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Signed January 28, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hampden Kuhns, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by David Andrew Bain, Law Offices of David A. Bain, LLC, Eduard Korsinsky, Levi & Korsinsky, LLP, pro hac vice & James Harrod, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, LLP, pro hac vice.

Patrick Groover, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by James Harrod, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, LLP, pro hac vice, Jeremy A. Lieberman, Pomerantz, LLP & Joseph Alexander Hood, II, Pomerantz, LLP.

Equifax Inc., Defendant, represented by Israel Dahan, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, LLP, pro hac vice, B. Warren Pope, King & Spalding, LLP, Benjamin Lee, King & Spalding, LLP & Michael R. Smith, King & Spalding, LLP.

Richard F. Smith, Defendant, represented by David M. Chaiken, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Meghan A. McCaffrey, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Michael E. Liftik, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP & Steven G. Madison, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.

Robert Brock, Movant, represented by Marshall P. Dees, Holzer & Holzer, LLC.

FRANKFURT-TRUST Investment GmbH, Movant, represented by David Andrew Bain, Law Offices of David A. Bain, LLC.

Union Asset Management Holding AG, Movant, represented by Abraham Alexander, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, Brenna D. Nelinson, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, LLP, James Harrod, Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann, LLP, pro hac vice, Amanda Kay Seals Bersinger, Bondurant Mixson & Elmore, LLP & Homer Lamar Mixson, Bondurant Mixson & Elmore.

OPINION AND ORDER

This is a securities fraud class action. It is before the Court on the Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 62]. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 62] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. Background

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases