KUANG v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Case No. 18-cv-03698-JST.

JIAHAO KUANG, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 23, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Cause: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nature of Suit: 899 Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act / Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jiahao Kuang & Deron Cooke, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, represented by Peter Allen Wald, Latham & Watkins LLP, Caitlin Dahl, Latham & Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Christine Patricia Sun, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Colleen Carlton Smith, Latham & Watkins LLP, Eric Swibel, Latham & Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Jennifer Lee Pasquarella, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Matthew C. Catalano, Latham & Watkins LLP, pro hac vice, Megan Fitzpatrick, Latham & Watkins LLP, Michael Bryan Kaufman, ACLU of Southern California, Sameer Ahmed, ACLU Foundation of Southern California & Sophia Louise Jane Mendez, Latham & Watkins LLP, pro hac vice.

United States Department of Defense & James Mattis, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense of the United States Department of Defense, Defendants, represented by Stuart Justin Robinson, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch & Nathan M. Swinton, Department of Justice Civil Division Federal Programs Branch.


ORDER RE: DISCOVERY JOINT LETTER BRIEF

Re: ECF No. 87

Before the Court is the parties' discovery joint letter brief. ECF No. 87. The parties presented additional argument in their joint case management statement and at a case management conference on January 16, 2019. ECF Nos. 92, 93. The Court will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases