1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SHAO v. ROBERTS
 

SHAO v. ROBERTS

Civil Action No. 18-1233 (RC).

YI TAI SHAO, Plaintiff, v. JOHN G. ROBERTS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 17, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

YI TAI SHAO, Plaintiff, pro se.

WILLIAM A. INGRAM, American Inn of Court, AMERICAN INNS OF COURT & SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA AMERICAN INN OF COURT, Defendants, represented by Michael E. Barnsback , O'HAGAN MEYER, PLLC.

JAMES MCMANIS, MICHAEL REEDY, MCMANIS FAULKNER, LLP & JANET EVERSON, Defendants, represented by James A. Lassart , MURPHY PEARSON BRADLEY FEENEY.

SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, REBECCA DELGADO, SUSAN WALKER, DAVID H. YAMASAKI, LISA HERRICK, CALIFORNIA SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, CLERK'S OFFICE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, EUGENE PREMO, Justice, FRANKLIN ELIA, Justice, PATRICIA BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Justice, EDWARD DAVILA, Judge, PATRICIA LUCAS, Judge, RICE PICHON, THEODORE ZAYNER, Judge, JOSHUA WEINSTEIN, Judge, MARY ANN GRILL, Judge, MAUREEN FOLAN, PETER KIRWAN, Judge, GREGORY SALDIVAR, Commissioner, SARAH SCOFIELD, JILL SARDESON, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, Doe Dft. No. 4, TANI G. CANTIL-SAKAUYE, Chief Justice as Doe Dft No. 5, ADRIENNE M. GROVER, Doe Dft. No. 1 & CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT AS DOE NO. 2, Defendants, represented by Drew T. Dorner , DUANE MORRIS LLP, Michael L. Fox , DUANE MORRIS LLP & Sean Patterson , DUANE MORRIS LLP.

DARRYL YOUNG, MARY L. MURPHY, MISOOK OH & SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Defendants, represented by George A. Brandt , OFFICE FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND & Lawrence J. Serrano , COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA.

BJ FADEM, Defendant, pro se.

JOHN ORLANDO, Defendant, pro se.

CAROLE TAIT-STARNES, Defendant, represented by James S. Aist , ANDERSON, COE & KING, LLP.

YOUTUBE, INC., a Delaware Corporation & GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants, represented by Veronica S. Ascarrunz , WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, PC.

ESTHER CHUNG, Defendant, represented by Max F Maccoby , WASHINGTON GLOBAL LAW GROUP, PLLC & Thomas Cummings , POTOMAC LITIGATION, pro hac vice.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Re Document Nos.: 31, 45, 58, 65, 75, 80, 81, 84, 117, 142.

DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AND FOR CHANGE OF VENUE, GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, SUA SPONTE DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS AGAINST ALL REMAINING DEFENDANTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases