1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SEAY v. OKLAHOMA BOARD OF DENTISTRY
 

SEAY v. OKLAHOMA BOARD OF DENTISTRY

Case No. CIV-17-682-D.

JOSEPH P. SEAY, D.D.S, MS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OKLAHOMA BOARD OF DENTISTRY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma.

January 10, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nature of Suit: 950 Constitutional - State Statute
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P Seay, D.D.S., MS & Lois Jacobs, D.D.S., Plaintiffs, represented by Charles W. Wright, Haupt Brooks Vandruff PLLC, Rachel L. Mor, Rachel Lawrence Mor Attorney at Law & Chanda R. Graham.

Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Susan Rogers, Executive Director of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Susan Rogers, Individually, James A Sparks, D.D.S., President of District 5 of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, James A Sparks, Individually, Audrey Crawford, D.D.S., District 8 Board Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Audrey Crawford, Individually, Curtis Bowman, D.D.S., District 1 Board Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Joseph Darrow, D.D.S., District 6 Board Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Phil Cotton, Chief, Public Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Angela Craig, R.D.H., Hygiene Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, James Gore, D.D.S., District 7 Board Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, James Gore, Individually, Michael Howl, D.D.S., 1st Vice President of District 2 of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Michael Howl, Individually, Lisa Nowlin, D.D.S., District 3 Board of Dentistry, Lisa Nowlin, Individually, Lori Roberts, Esq., Public Board Member of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry, Jeff Lunday, D.D.S., 2nd Vice President of the Oklahoma Board of Dentistry & Jeff Lunday, Individually, Defendants, represented by Kenneth T. McConkey, Resolution Legal Group & Stephen L. McCaleb, Derryberry Quigley Solomon & Naifeh.

Curtis Bowman, Individually, Defendant, represented by Stephen L. McCaleb, Derryberry Quigley Solomon & Naifeh.

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 28]. Plaintiffs have filed their response in opposition [Doc. No. 29] and Defendants have replied [Doc. No. 30]. The matter is fully briefed and at issue.

BACKGROUND1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases