1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HUFFMAN v. DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY
 

HUFFMAN v. DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY

Case No. CV 418-184.

BRIAN J. HUFFMAN, as Administrator of the Estate of Eliud Montoya-Arcos, deceased, Plaintiff, v. THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY, WOLF TREE INC., MAJORIE L. CONNER, CHRISTOPHER BRANCH, OSCAR CRUZ, and PABLO RANGEL, a/k/a Pablo Rangel-Rubio, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Georgia, Savannah Division.

January 8, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 08 U.S.C. § 1324
Cause: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian J. Huffman, as Administrator of the Estate of Eliud Montoya-Arcos, Deceased, Plaintiff, represented by James D. Durham , Savage & Turner, P.C., John Charles Watts, Jr. , Watts & Watts, Robert Bartley Turner , Savage & Turner, PC & William Jarrell Degenhart , Savage & Turner, PC.

The Davey Tree Expert Company & Wolf Tree, Inc., Defendants, represented by Andrea B. Daloia , Thompson Hine LLP, pro hac vice, Elizabeth B. Wright , Thompson Hine, LLP, pro hac vice, George T. Major, Jr. , Oliver Maner, LLP, Inman Gregory Hodges , Oliver Maner, LLP, John R. Mitchell , Thompson Hine LLP, pro hac vice & Matthew David Ridings , Thompson Hine LLP, pro hac vice.

Marjorie L. Conner, Defendant, represented by Kimberly Cofer Butler , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, LLP & R. Clay Ratterree , Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams LLP.

Christopher Branch, Defendant, represented by Carlton Edward Joyce , Bouhan Falligant, LLP & Vandana Murty Abrams , Bouhan Falligant, LLP.

Oscar Cruz, Defendant, represented by Wiley A. Wasden, III , Brennan & Wasden, LLP & William E. Dillard, III , Brennan, Wasden & Painter, LLP.

Pablo Rangel, also known as Pablo Rangel-Rubio, Defendant, pro se.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Interested Party, represented by Christopher Howard , U.S. Attorney's Office Assistant U.S. Attorney & Tania D. Groover , U.S. Attorney's Office.

ORDER

Before the Court is the Government's Motion to Intervene and Stay Civil Case and Discovery. (Doc. 36.) In its motion, the Government requests that it be allowed to intervene in this action "for the limited purpose of moving to stay the civil proceeding and any civil discovery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases