1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. IN RE BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
 

IN RE BIOMET M2A MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

Cause Nos. 3:12-MD-2391, 3:14-CV-2002, No. 3:15-CV-540., 3:16-CV-871, 3:17-CV-455, 3:17-CV-507, 3:17-CV-509, 3:17-CV-603

IN RE: BIOMET M2a MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL 2391), This Document Relates to: WOHLLEBER V. BIOMET ET AL. CLIFFORD V. BIOMET ET AL. CHAPMAN V. BIOMET ET AL. HUGHES V. BIOMET ET AL. LITTLE V. BIOMET ET AL. MCGINNIS V. BIOMET ET AL. WISE V. BIOMET ET AL.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division.

January 3, 2019.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Product Liability
Nature of Suit: 365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

In re Biomet M2a Magnum Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, Plaintiff, represented by Marilyn T. McGoldrick , Thornton & Naumes LLP, pro hac vice.

Plaintiffs' Lead Co-Counsel, Plaintiff, represented by Ahmed S. Diab , Gomez Trial Attorneys, pro hac vice, Brenda S. Fulmer , Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA, pro hac vice & Navan Ward, Jr. , Beasley Allen Crow Methvin Portis & Miles PC, pro hac vice.

Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Plaintiff, represented by Ahmed S. Diab , Gomez Trial Attorneys, pro hac vice & John P. Fiske , Gomez Trial Attorneys, pro hac vice.

Plaintiffs' Executive Committee, Plaintiff, represented by Ahmed S. Diab , Gomez Trial Attorneys, pro hac vice.

Defendants' Lead Counsel, Defendant, represented by John D. Winter , Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, pro hac vice.

Defendants' Liaison Counsel, Defendant, represented by Adrienne Franco Busby , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Andrew L. Campbell , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, J. Joseph Tanner , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Stephanie N. Russo , Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Erin Linder Hanig , LaDue Curran & Kuehn LLC & John D. LaDue , LaDue Curran & Kuehn LLC.

OPINION AND ORDER

Biomet filed motions for summary judgment in seven cases that were centralized or filed directly into this multidistrict litigation docket, which addresses personal injury claims arising from the Biomet M2a and M2a-38 metal-on-metal hip replacement devices. The parties agree that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases