JUANEA L. BUTLER, individually and as representative of all others similarly situated,
v.
DENKA PERFORMANCE ELASTOMER, LLC, ET AL., SECTION "F".
United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 3, 2019.
January 3, 2019.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Juanea L Butler, Individually and as representative of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by Danny Dustin Russell, Russell Law Firm, LLC.
Denka Performance Elastomer LLC, Defendant, represented by James Conner Percy, Jones Walker, Brett S. Venn, Jones Walker, Justin J. Marocco, Jones Walker, Michael A. Chernekoff, Jones Walker & Michael R. Rhea, Jones Walker.
E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Defendant, represented by Deborah DeRoche Kuchler, Kuchler Polk Weiner, LLC, Bradley H. Weidenhammer, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua Doguet, Kuchler Polk Weiner, LLC, Kaitlyn L. Coverstone, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, pro hac vice, Kevin T. Van Wart, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, pro hac vice, Rebecca C. Fitzpatrick, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, pro hac vice, Sarah E. Iiams, Kuchler Polk Schell Weiner & Richeson, L.L.C. & Stanley M. Wash, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, pro hac vice.
Louisiana State, Through the Department of Environmental Quality, Defendant, represented by Lawrence Edward Marino, Oats & Marino & Patrick B. McIntire, Oats & Marino.
Louisiana State, Through the Department of Health; Incorrectly named as Louisiana State Through the Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant, represented by Timothy Wayne Hardy, Roedel, Parsons, Koch, Blache, Balhoff & McCollister, Christina Berthelot Peck, Roedel, Parsons, Koch, Blache, Balhoff & McCollister & Willard L. West, Roedel, Parsons, Koch, Blache, Balhoff & McCollister.
ORDER AND REASONS
MARTIN L.C. FELDMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is the plaintiff's motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, the motion is DENIED.
Background
This environmental tort litigation arises from the production of neoprene, which allegedly exposes those near...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
