GARCIA v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK.

RAYMOND GARCIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

December 19, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor / Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Nature of Suit: 720 Labor: Labor / Mgt. Relations
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cherie Mancini & Frederick Gustafson, Consol Plaintiffs, represented by Michael Julian Mcavoyamaya .

Raymond Garcia, as a member, and on behalf of Clark County Public Employees Association, Ray Liepins, as a member of Local 1107, and as Local 1107 Executive Board, and Vice President of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Non-Supervisory Collective Bargaining Unit on be half of SEIU Local 1107, Miles Rodela, as a member of Local 1107, and as Local 1107 Executive Board, and Vice President of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority Non-Supervisory Collective Bargaining Unit on be half of SEIU Local 1107 & Karla Nolan, as a member of Local 1107, and Steward of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitor Authority Non-Supervisory Collective Bargaining Unit, and on behalf of SEIU Local 1107, Plaintiffs, represented by Michael Julian Mcavoyamaya .

Service Employees International Union, Defendant, represented by Eli Eduardo Naduris-Weissman , Rothner, Segall & Greenstone, pro hac vice, Glenn Rothner , Rothner, Segall, Greenstone & Leheny, pro hac vice, Jonathan Michael Cohen , Rothner, Segall & Greenstone, Kevin B. Archibald , Christensen James & Martin, Chtd. & Evan James , Christensen James & Martin.

Executive Board of the Nevada Service Employees Union, in official capacity, Defendant, represented by Glenn Rothner , Rothner, Segall, Greenstone & Leheny, pro hac vice, Kevin B. Archibald , Christensen James & Martin, Chtd., Eli Eduardo Naduris-Weissman , Rothner, Segall & Greenstone, Evan James , Christensen James & Martin & Jonathan Michael Cohen , Rothner, Segall & Greenstone.


Order Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Setting Response Date, and Setting Hearing Regarding Trial

[ECF No. 240]

The plaintiffs move for an order enjoining the defendants from holding an election pending the plaintiffs' appeal of my order denying the plaintiffs' motion for an injunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases