RAYMOND v. SPIRIT AeroSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.

Case No. 16-1282-JWB.

DONETTA RAYMOND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SPIRIT AEROSYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

December 17, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donetta Raymond, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Frederick Heston, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Jilun Sha, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Randy Williams, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, William Scott Denny, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Debra Hatcher, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Brian Marks, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Russell Ballard, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Gregory Bucchin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bruce Ensor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Forrest Faris, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Cheryl Renee Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Clark T. Harbaugh, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Craig Hoobler, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Brian Scott Jackson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, William Koch, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Fred Longan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, David B. Miller, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Kenneth L Poole, Jr., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bahram Rahbar, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Russell Sprague, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Craig Tolson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Robert Troilo, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Curtis J. Vines, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bradley Kent Asmann, Richard T. Bach, Robin S. Bradley, Kathleen K. Byram, Emilio C. Caire, Jr., John M. Chandler, Victor L. Daniels, Deadra E. Doyon, Roderick L. Duke, Anne M. Duncan, Jimmie L. Felt, Steven Eric Floyd, Ronald E. Guest, Joel M. Goyot, Audrey Henning, Alan B. Holt, Randy T. Hopper, Donna J. Hottman, James Hutchison, Korvin J. Kilgroe, Lambert Kobagaya, Nick Koss, Dennis Kraus, John O. Lawellin, Robert H. Lawson, Brent John Lobile, Jill Lorber, Jeff Martin, Brian T. Maschino, William B. Moehring, Brian Owens, Jodene Patterson, Cornell D. Payne, Nancy D. Rapp, James D. Reese, Dennis Edward Richardson, Jeffrey Lee Roberts, James R. Russell, Terry Sawyer, Ronald Schauf, Shane Schmidt, Chadwick R. Scott, Michael Duane Shaheen, Terry Spear, Diane G. Ward, Larry G. Weaver & Glen Fondaw, Plaintiffs, represented by Daniel B. Kohrman , AARP Foundation Litigation, pro hac vice, Dara S. Smith , AARP Foundation Litigation, pro hac vice, Diane S. King , King & Greisen, LLP, pro hac vice, Jennifer Bezoza , King & Greisen, LLP, pro hac vice & Laurie A. McCann , AARP Foundation Litigation, pro hac vice.

Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. & Spirit Aerosystems, Inc., Defendants, represented by Boyd A. Byers , Foulston Siefkin LLP, Charles E. McClellan , Foulston Siefkin LLP, James M. Armstrong , Foulston Siefkin LLP, Jeff P. DeGraffenreid , Foulston Siefkin LLP, Stacy D. Mueller , Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, pro hac vice, Steven W. Moore , Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, pro hac vice & Teresa L. Shulda , Foulston Siefkin LLP.

Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace, IFPTE Local 2001, Movant, represented by M. Jeanette Fedele , The Kelman Buescher Firm, pro hac vice & Thomas E. Hammond , Hammond, Zongker & Farris, LLC.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on the parties' cross-motions for partial summary judgment. (Docs. 338, 342.) The motions are fully briefed and are ripe for decision. (Docs. 341, 343, 356, 358, 366, 368.) For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases