ESPINOZA v. HUNT & HENRIQUES

Case No. 18-cv-02752-NC.

DIANAH ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. HUNT & HENRIQUES, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

December 3, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dianah Espinoza, Plaintiff, represented by Patric Lester, Lester & Associates & Scott M. Grace, Grace Law Group.

Hunt & Henriques, Attorneys at Law & Merrick Bank Corporation, Defendants, represented by Stephen Julian Newman, Stroock and Stroock and Lavan LLP & Julieta Stepanyan, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP.


ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT MERRICK'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Re: Dkt. No. 50

Defendant Merrick Bank Corporation moves to dismiss plaintiff Dianah Espinoza's claims against it for violation of California's credit reporting law and intentional misrepresentation. Merrick...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases