APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. v. MUTO TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Cause No. 1:17-CV-519-LY.

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MUTO TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Austin Division.

November 30, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl Bayer, Special Master, pro se.

Applied Materials, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Chad Ennis, Bracewell LLP & Patrick J. Connolly, Bracewell LLP, pro hac vice.

Muto Technology, Inc., Defendant, represented by David D. Bahler, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Catherine Garza, Norton Rose Fulbright & Talbot R. Hansum, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP.

Muto Technology, Inc., Counter Plaintiff, represented by David D. Bahler, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Catherine Garza, Norton Rose Fulbright & Talbot R. Hansum, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP.

Applied Materials, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Chad Ennis, Bracewell LLP & Patrick J. Connolly, Bracewell LLP, pro hac vice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CLAIMS CONSTRUCTION

Before the court in the above-styled and numbered patent-infringement action are the parties' Joint Claim Construction Statement filed January 26, 2018 (Docs. #29); Plaintiff Applied Materials, Inc.'s and Defendant Muto Technology...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases