GILLIS v. MURPHY-BROWN, LLC

Case No. 7:14-CV-185-BR.

ANNJEANETTE GILLIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MURPHY-BROWN, LLC d/b/a SMITHFIELD HOG PRODUCTION DIVISION, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division.

November 19, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Personal Injury
Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Annjeanette Gillis, Individually and as Co-Executor of the Estate for Gwendolyn Pickett, Daqwan Robinson, Woody Gillis, Individually, and as Co-Executor of the Estate of Gwendolyn Pickett, Allen A Johnson, William Murphy, Edna Murphy, Roberto Murphy, Mary Tatum, Lottie Fowler, Elsie Darlene Maynor, Kim Newton, Connie Newton & Kiron Newton, Plaintiffs, represented by John S. Hughes , Wallace and Graham, P.A., Lisa Blue Baron , Baron and Blue, Michael Kaeske, Jr. , Kaeske Law Firm, Eric Manchin , Kaeske Law Firm, Lynn Bradshaw , Kaeske Law Firm & Mona Lisa Wallace , Wallace and Graham, P.A.

Annie Doris Johnson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Allen Thomas Johnson, Plaintiff, represented by John S. Hughes , Wallace and Graham, P.A., Lisa Blue Baron , Baron and Blue, Michael Kaeske, Jr. , Kaeske Law Firm, Eric Manchin , Kaeske Law Firm & Lynn Bradshaw , Kaeske Law Firm.

Murphy-Brown, LLC, doing business as Smithfield Hog Production Division, Defendant, represented by Brian C. Riopelle , McGuireWoods, LLP, Eugene E. Mathews, III , McGuireWoods, LLP, James F. Neale , McGuireWoods LLP, Mark E. Anderson , McGuireWoods LLP, Robert Edwin Thackston , Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young LLP, Tennille J. Checkovich , McGuireWoods, LLP, Christian E. Henneke , McGuire Woods LLP, Christopher E. Trible , McGuire Woods LLP, Darin K. Waylett , McGuire Woods LLP, Garrett H. Hooe , McGuire Woods LLP, Jakarra J. Jones , McGuire Woods LLP, Jocelyn Mitnaul Mallette , McGuireWoods LLP, Michael W. Stark , McGuire Woods LLP & Richard C. Beaulieu , McGuire Woods LLP.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the court is defendant's motion to clarify its objections to the deposition designations of Kraig Westerbeek and exclude his videotaped testimony. (ECF No. 242). Plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition to that motion. (ECF No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases