1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BAKER v. SUNBURST CONSULTING, INC.
 

BAKER v. SUNBURST CONSULTING, INC.

No. CV 16-124-BLG-SPW-TJC.

BROCK BAKER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SUNBURST CONSULTING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Montana, Billings Division.

November 8, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brock Baker, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, represented by David I. Moulton, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC, pro hac vice, Philip L. McGrady, McGRADY LAW & Richard Rex J. Burch, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC, pro hac vice.

Alexa Guttormson, Plaintiff, represented by Philip L. McGrady, McGRADY LAW & Richard Rex J. Burch, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC, pro hac vice.

Alexandra Keenan, Brian P Hartry, Steve Holzworth, Ziaullah Ranjha, Claire K McNamara, Kyle Eno, Donovan Wilczynski, Christopher Adair, Steven Candelaria, Coilin D Deakin, Joshua Williams, Rex Lloyd, Christina Munoz, Vimal Pradham, Courttnee Schmidt, Samantha Buhr, Tom Griggs, Courtney Wilske, Lindsay Cobb, Ezra Llewellyn, Heather Davis, Erika J. Peters, John Kehoe, Arden Fortenberry, Adrian Power, Dillon Bailey, Gerald A. Gilbert, Casey A. Pearce, Kenneth Bergum, Roger Glander, Nathanael C. Barta & Gage Chandler, Plaintiffs, represented by David I. Moulton, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC, Philip L. McGrady, McGRADY LAW & Richard Rex J. Burch, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC, pro hac vice.

Seth M. Joramo, Plaintiff, represented by David I. Moulton, BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC & Philip L. McGrady, McGRADY LAW.

Sunburst Consulting, Inc., Defendant, represented by Jason S. Ritchie, Ritchie Manning LLP, Brianne C. McClafferty, HOLLAND & HART & Michael P. Manning, Ritchie Manning LLP.

ORDER

Upon the Court's review and consideration of the Parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Dismissal of Action (Doc. 71), and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement is GRANTED.

2. The Court finds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases