International Paper Company, Defendant, represented by Gary L. Pasheilich , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP & Vincent Atriano , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.
Neenah Paper, Inc., Fox River Paper Company, Fox River Paper Sales Company & Fox Valley Corporation, Defendants, represented by Shane A. Farolino , Roetzel & Andress & John A. Heer , Walter & Haverfield LLP.
Aetna Paper Company, Champion International Corp., Howard Paper Mills, Inc. & St. Regis Paper Company, Defendants, represented by Vincent Atriano , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.
Badger Paper Mills, Inc., Defendant, pro se.
Brownfield Charities, Inc., Defendant, represented by Thomas Hays Pyper , Pyper and Nordstrom LLC.
Harrison Holdings, L.P., HPM Investors, Inc. & HPP, Inc., Defendants, represented by Richard Albert Talda , Coolidge Wall Co., L.P.A. & Daniel Jerome Gentry , Coolidge Wall Co., L.P.A.
Brownfield Charities, Inc., Cross Claimant, represented by Thomas Hays Pyper , Pyper and Nordstrom LLC.
Aetna Paper Company, Champion International Corp., Howard Paper Mills, Inc. & St. Regis Paper Company, Cross Defendants, represented by Vincent Atriano , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.
Fox River Paper Company, Fox River Paper Sales Company & Fox Valley Corporation, Cross Defendants, represented by John A. Heer , Walter & Haverfield LLP.
International Paper Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Gary L. Pasheilich , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP & Vincent Atriano , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.
International Paper Company, Counter Claimant, represented by Vincent Atriano , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP & Gary L. Pasheilich , Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP.
Brownfield Charities, Inc., Counter Defendant, represented by Thomas Hays Pyper , Pyper and Nordstrom LLC.
Fox River Paper Sales Company, Fox River Paper Company, Fox Valley Corporation & Neenah Paper, Inc., Counter Claimants, represented by Shane A. Farolino , Roetzel & Andress & John A. Heer , Walter & Haverfield LLP.
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE HPP DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #249) AND DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION FOR STAY PENDING RULINGS ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON FACTS (DOC. #252); RESERVING RULING ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SEEK IN EXCESS OF FORTY REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION (DOC. #250)
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.