1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. McFALL v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
 

McFALL v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN

No. 2:17-cv-0847-KJM-AC.

MONTE McFALL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

October 30, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Monte McFall & Patricia Hutchinson, Plaintiffs, represented by Daniel Joseph Malakauskas , Malakauskas Law Firm.

County of San Joaquin, City of Stockton & Jimmy Fritts, in his official and individual capacities, Defendants, represented by Dana A. Suntag , Herum Crabtree Suntag & Joshua J. Stevens , Herum Crabtree Suntag.

ORDER

Plaintiffs allege defendants violated federal and state law when they fraudulently obtained a warrant to search plaintiffs' residence and later seized plaintiffs' property while executing that search warrant. As explained below, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases