1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HULS v. MEYER
 

HULS v. MEYER

No. 4:18-CV-04126-KES.

MARK A. HULS, STEVEN E. PETERSON, CATHERINE M. PETERSON, and DAVID L. SKOGLUND, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID M. MEYER and NANCY R. MEYER, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Southern Division.

October 25, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Other Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other Contract
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark A. Huls, Steven E. Peterson, Catherine M. Peterson & David L. Skoglund, Plaintiffs, represented by Michael E. Unke.

David M. Meyer & Nancy R. Meyer, Defendants, represented by Daniel R. Fritz, II, Ballard Spahr LLP & Timothy R. Rahn, Ballard Spahr LLP.

David M. Meyer & Nancy R. Meyer, Counter Claimants, represented by Daniel R. Fritz, II, Ballard Spahr LLP & Timothy R. Rahn, Ballard Spahr LLP.

Mark A. Huls, Catherine M. Peterson, Steven E. Peterson & David L. Skoglund, Counter Defendants, represented by Michael E. Unke.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR REMAND

Plaintiffs, Mark A. Huls, Catherine M. Peterson, Steven E. Peterson, and David L. Skoglund, filed this lawsuit in the First Judicial Circuit Court in McCook County, South Dakota. Docket 1-2. Defendants, David and Nancy Meyer, removed the case to this court. Docket 1. Plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases