1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 348 F.Supp.3d
  5. 348 F.Supp.3d 87 (2018)
 

CARDIONET, LLC v. INFOBIONIC, INC.

Civil Action No. 17-cv-10445-IT.

348 F.Supp.3d 87 (2018)

CARDIONET, LLC, and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. INFOBIONIC, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts.

Signed October 16, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradford J. Badke, Ching-Lee Fukuda, Todd M. Simpson, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, Jack W. Pirozzolo, Sidley Austin LLP, Boston, MA, for Plaintiffs.

Abigail Amato Rives, Gabriel K. Bell, Maximilian A. Grant, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, Charles H. Sanders, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, Kristopher R. Davis, Latham & Watkins LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiffs CardioNet, LLC ("CardioNet") and Braemar Manufacturing, LLC ("Braemar") allege that products manufactured and distributed by Defendant InfoBionic, Inc. ("InfoBionic") infringe on Plaintiffs' patent, U.S. Patent Number 7,941,207 ("the '207 patent"). Am. Compl...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases