1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JACK v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD.
 

JACK v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD.

No. 2:17-cv-00537-JLR.

LESLIE JACK, individually and as Personal Representative of PATRICK JACK; DAVID JACK, individually, Plaintiffs, v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

August 9, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Asbestos Litigation
Nature of Suit: 368 P.I. : Asbestos
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie Jack, individually and as Personal Representative of PATRICK JACK & David Jack, individually, Plaintiffs, represented by Benjamin H. Adams , DEAN OMAR & BRANHAM, LLP, pro hac vice, Charles W. Branham, III , DEAN OMAR & BRANHAM, LLP, pro hac vice, Kristin M. Houser , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER, Lisa W. Shirley , DEAN OMAR BRANHAM, LLP, pro hac vice, Lucas W.H. Garrett , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER, William Joel Rutzick , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER, Elizabeth Jean McLafferty , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER & Thomas J. Breen , SCHROETER GOLDMARK & BENDER.

Borg-Warner Morse Tec LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Borg-Warner Corporation, Defendant, represented by Richard D. Ross , BENNETT BIGELOW & LEEDOM.

Ford Motor Company, Defendant, represented by Daniel K. Reising , FUCILE & REISING & Mark J. Fucile , FUCILE & REISING.

Honeywell International Inc, sued as successor-in-interest to Bendix Corporation, Defendant, represented by Jospeh S. Pevsner , THOMPSON & KNIGHT LLP, pro hac vice, Kristine E. Kruger , PERKINS COIE & Mary P. Gaston , PERKINS COIE.

Ingersoll Rand Company, Defendant, represented by Katherine A. Lawler , NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP, pro hac vice, Kevin J. Craig , GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP, Mark B. Tuvim , GORDON & REES & Trevor J. Mohr , GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP.

Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant, represented by Robert H. Berkes , BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, pro hac vice, Ryan T. Moore , BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, pro hac vice, Viiu Spangler Khare , BERKES CRANE ROBINSON & SEAL, pro hac vice, Andrew Gordon Yates , LANE POWELL PC, Jeffrey M. Odom , LANE POWELL PC & Tim D. Wackerbarth , LANE POWELL PC.

Viad Corporation, formerly known as, Defendant, represented by Ronald C. Gardner , GARDNER TRABOLSI & ASSOC. PLLC.

Dana Companies, LLC, sued as successor in interest to Victor Gasket Manufacturing Company, Defendant, represented by R. Thomas Radcliffe , DEHAY & ELLISTON LLP, pro hac vice & Diane J. Kero , GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL.

STIPULATED MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANT GOULDS PUMPS, LLC, ONLY

STIPULATION

Plaintiffs and Defendant Goulds Pumps, LLC, hereby stipulate that all claims against Defendant Goulds Pumps, LLC, only, may be dismissed with prejudice and without costs and/or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases