1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S. v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
 

U.S. v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY

Case No.: 1:18-cv-174.

United States el al, Plaintiff, v. Western Surety Company, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. North Dakota.

September 25, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Cause: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Nature of Suit: 130 Miller Act
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

United States, for the use and benefit of Thomas Industrial Coatings & Thomas Industrial Coatings, Plaintiffs, represented by Mark R. Hanson , Nilles Law Firm.

Western Surety Company, Defendant, represented by Nicholas D. Kovarik , Piskel Yahne Kovarik, PLLC & Paul R. Sanderson , Evenson Sanderson, PC.

ORDER FOR RULE 26(f) PLANNING MEETING AND RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, AND ORDER RE RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY DISPUTES

IT IS ORDERED:

RULE 26(f) MEETING & RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

The court shall hold a Rule 16(b) initial pretrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases