N.Y., through his guardians David and Leilanie Yu, Plaintiff,
v.
SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendant.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 21, 2018.
September 21, 2018.
Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Source: PACER
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
N.Y., through his guardians David and Leilanie Yu, Plaintiff, represented by D. Gill Sperlein, Randazza Legal Group, PLLC & Marc John Randazza, Randazza Legal Group, PLLC.
San Ramon Valley Unified School District, Rick Schmitt, in his personal and official capacities as Superintendent of the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, Jason Reimann, in his personal and official capacities as Director of Education Services of the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, Ruth Steele, in her personal and official capacities as Principal of San Ramon Valley High School, Jamie Keith, in her personal and official capacities as Assistant Principal of San Ramon Valley High School, Dearborn Ramos, in her personal and official capacities as Assistant Principal of San Ramon Valley High School & Bernie Phelan, in his personal and official capacities as Assistant Principal of San Ramon Valley High School, Defendants, represented by Mark E. Davis, Davis & Young, APLC, Adam Jacobsen Davis, Davis & Young, APLC & Patrick Colin Malloy, Davis & Young, APLC.
Janet Willford, in her personal and official capacities as Leadership Teacher of San Ramon Valley High School & Kerri Christman Gilbert, in her personal and official capacities as Resident Substitute Teacher of San Ramon Valley High School, Defendants, represented by Eugene Burton Elliot, Bertrand, Fox, Elliot, Osman & Wenzel & Nicole Lauren Phillips, Bertrand, Fox, Elliot, Osman and Wenzel.
Jason Krolikowski, in his personal and official capacities as Principal of San Ramon Valley High School, Defendant, represented by Mark E. Davis, Davis & Young, APLC & Patrick Colin Malloy, Davis & Young, APLC.
AMENDED*ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATION DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART WILLFORD AND GILBERT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LIMITED LEAVE TO AMEND
Re: Dkt. Nos. 68, 69
MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions: (1...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
