NAT'L RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
JULIE SU, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner, State of California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Defendant, and
TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS, et al., Intervenors.
United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Los Angeles Junction Railway, TTX COMPANY & Central California Traction Company, Plaintiffs, represented by Donald James Munro , Jones Day, pro hac vice & Kelsey A. Israel-Trummel , Jones Day.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, BLET, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Erika A. Diehl-GIbbons , Smart Transportation Division, pro hac vice, Matthew J. Gauger , Weinberg Roger & Rosenfeld, PC, Michael S. Wolly , Zwerdling, Paul, Kahn & Wollly, P.C., pro hac vice & Richard S. Edelman , Mooney, Green, Saindon, Murphy and Welch, P.C., pro hac vice.
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees, Division IBT, BMWE, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, BRS, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, IBEW, National Conference of Firemen & Oilers District of Local 32BJ, SEIU, NCFO & International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, SMART-TD and SMART-MD, Intervenor Plaintiffs, represented by Erika A. Diehl-GIbbons , Smart Transportation Division.
Julie Su, in her official capacity as Labor Commissioner, State of California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, Defendant, represented by Peter H. Chang , Office of the Attorney General Department of Justice.
United States of America, Unknown, represented by Kristina A. Wolfe , U.S. Department Of Justice Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch.
JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
As directed by the Court on September 5, 2018 (ECF No. 92), the parties have met and conferred on a proposed schedule for submitting supplemental briefing on the Ninth Circuit's recent decision in Board of Trustees v. Chambers, No. 16...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
