1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD.
 

HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD.

No. 1:17-cv-921.

HAIER AMERICA TRADING, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, CO., LTD., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. New York.

September 7, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Haier America Trading, L.L.C., Plaintiff, represented by Alfonso Garcia Chan , Shore, Chan Law Firm, pro hac vice, Andrew Michael Howard , Shore, Chan Law Firm, pro hac vice, Ari Benjamin Rafilson , Shore, Chan Law Firm, pro hac vice, Elliot A. Hallak , Harris, Beach Law Firm, Joseph Frederick DePumpo , Shore, Chan Law Firm, Joseph Frederick DePumpo , Shore, Chan Law Firm, pro hac vice, Michael W. Shore , Shore, Chan Law Firm, pro hac vice, Russell James DePalma , Shore, Chan Law Firm, pro hac vice & William Ellerman , Shore Chan DePumpo LLP.

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Defendant, represented by Samuel B. Davidoff , Williams & Connolly LLP.

LG Electronics, Inc. & Zenith Electronics, LLC, Defendants, represented by Peter K. Huston , Sidley, Austin Law Firm, pro hac vice, Peter Heeseok Kang , Sidley Austin LLP, pro hac vice, Ryan M. Sandrock , Sidley, Austin Law Firm, pro hac vice, Sarah A. Hemmendinger , Sidley, Austin Law Firm, pro hac vice, Alan Jay Goldberg , Whiteman, Osterman Law Firm & William S. Nolan , Whiteman, Osterman Law Firm.

Panasonic Corporation, Defendant, represented by Adam C. Hemlock , Weil, Gotshal Law Firm & David Yohai , Weil, Gotshal Law Firm.

Koninklijke Philips N.V., Defendant, represented by Bella S. Satra , Barclay Damon LLP & Linda J. Clark , Barclay Damon LLP.

Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Defendant, represented by Michael James Perry , Baker, Botts Law Firm, pro hac vice, Michael Charles Ritter , Baker, Botts Law Firm, pro hac vice & Paul A. Ragusa , Baker, Botts Law Firm.

MPEG LA, L.L.C., Defendant, represented by Delton L. Vandever , Windels, Marx Law Firm.

DECISION & ORDER

Before the Court are Defendants' motions to dismiss this antitrust and commercial action. See dkt. #s 38, 40. The parties have briefed the issues and the Court has determined the decide the matter without oral argument.

I. BACKGROUND

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases