EWERT v. NETPULSE

Case No. 2:17-cv-995-CW.

BRUCE M. EWERT, Plaintiff, v. NETPULSE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Utah.

August 27, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Ewert, Plaintiff, pro se.

Netpulse, doing business as VA Netpulse & Active Theory, doing business as Bitgym, Defendants, represented by Charles L. Roberts , WASATCH-IP.

Johnson Health Tech North America, Defendant, represented by Evan S. Strassberg , MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP & John C. Scheller , MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP, pro hac vice.


MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER

Plaintiff Bruce M. Ewert, proceeding in forma pauperis and pro se, brings this civil rights action against Netpulse, Johnson Health Tech North America, Life Fitness, and Active Theory for patent infringement and breach of contract. (Complaint, ECF No. 3.) This action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases