1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BARRANCO v. 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION
 

BARRANCO v. 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION

Civil No. 13-00412 LEK-RLP.

RONALD BARRANCO, Plaintiff, v. 3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 3D SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, ABRAHAM REICHENTAL, DAMON GREGOIRE, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Hawaii.

August 13, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Barranco, Plaintiff, represented by Andrew D. Stewart , Showa Law Office, Mark Poe , Gaw Poe LLP, pro hac vice, Randolph Gaw , Gaw Poe LLP, pro hac vice & Vernon Y.T. Woo , City Financial Tower.

3D Systems Corporation, a Delaware corporation & 3D Systems, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants, represented by Christopher C. Lam , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, pro hac vice, Marguerite S. Willis , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, pro hac vice, Nikole S. Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, pro hac vice, Thomas Benedict , Farm Benedict Sugihara & Dawn T. Sugihara , Farm Benedict Sugihara.

Cox Fricke LLP, Lienors & Law Office of Jack R. Naiditch, Inc., Interested Partys, represented by David J. Minkin , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon & William C. McCorriston , McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon.

3D Systems, Inc., a California corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Christopher C. Lam , Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, pro hac vice, Marguerite S. Willis , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, Nikole S. Mergo , Nexsen Pruet, LLC, Thomas Benedict , Farm Benedict Sugihara & Dawn T. Sugihara , Farm Benedict Sugihara.

Ronald Barranco, Counter Defendant, represented by Andrew D. Stewart , Showa Law Office, Mark Poe , Gaw Poe LLP, pro hac vice, Randolph Gaw , Gaw Poe LLP, pro hac vice & Vernon Y.T. Woo , City Financial Tower.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S RULE 52(b)/59(e) MOTION TO AMEND BENCH FINDINGS AND JUDGMENT

On April 19, 2018, Plaintiff Ronald Barranco ("Plaintiff") filed his Rule 52(b)/59(e) Motion to Amend Bench Findings and Judgment ("Motion"). [Dkt. no. 398.] On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases