HADSELL v. BASKIN

Case No. 4:18-cv-00293-KAW.

CHRISTOPHER HADSELL, Plaintiff, v. BARRY BASKIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

August 2, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Hadsell, Plaintiff, pro se.

Barry Baskin, in his individual capacity, Christopher Bowen, Tani Cantil-Sakauye, in her individual and official capacity as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of California, Barbara Hinton, in her individual capacity, Garry Ichikawa, in his individual capacity, Barbara Jones, in her individual capacity, Terri Mockler, in her individual capacity, Kathleen Murphy, in her individual capacity, Henry Needham, Jr., Anita Santos, in her individual capacity, Mark Simons, in his individual capacity, Charles Treat, in his individual capacity & Edward Weil, in his individual capacity, Defendants, represented by Sharon Margaret Nagle , Bold, Polisner, Maddow, Nelson & Judson.

Kimberly Campbell, in her individual capacity, William Whiting, in his individual capacity & William Whiting, Defendants, represented by Alison Paige Buchanan , Attorney at Law.

Contra Costa Department of Child Support Services, Mary Lindelof, in her individual capacity, Melinda Self, in her individual capacity & G. Boyd Tarin, in his individual capacity, Defendants, represented by Patrick L. Hurley , Contra Costa County Counsel.

Garrett Dailey, in his individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Jonathan Matthew Blute , Murphy Pearson Bradley Feeney.

Catherine Isham, in her individual capacity, Defendant, pro se.

Tracey Wapnick, in her individual capacity, Defendant, represented by Whitney Marie Carlson , Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney.


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS AGAINST DEFENDANT WAPNICK Re: Dkt. No. 90

On July 17, 2018, Plaintiff Christopher Hadsell filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 against Defendant Tracey Wapnick and her attorneys and law firm. (Pl.'s Mot.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases