EVERETT v. INTERFOR U.S., INC.

No. 5:18-cv-39-DPM.

REGINALD EVERETT, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. INTERFOR U.S., INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division.

July 18, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reginald Everett, Individually and on behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, represented by Christopher Wesley Burks , Sanford Law Firm & Joshua Sanford , Sanford Law Firm.

Interfor US Inc, Defendant, represented by James M. Shore , Stoel Rives LLP, pro hac vice, Jill D. Bowman , pro hac vice, David P. Martin , Rose Law Firm & Victoria H. Jones , Rose Law Firm.


ORDER

The Court approves the proposed settlement agreement. No. 28. All material things considered, the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Lynn's Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1353 (11th Cir. 1982). The parties have agreed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases