TATONKA CAPITAL CORPORATION v. CONNELLY

Civil Action No. 16-cv-01141-MSK-NYW.

TATONKA CAPITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL CONNELLY, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

July 18, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tatonka Capital Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, represented by John Henry Schlie, John Henry Schlie, P.C. & Denis Hugh Mark, Hamilton Faatz, PC.

Michael Connelly, Defendant, pro se.

Tatonka Capital Corporation, a Colorado corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by John Henry Schlie, John Henry Schlie, P.C. & Denis Hugh Mark, Hamilton Faatz, PC.

Gene Eidelman, Counter Claimant, pro se.


OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Plaintiff's ("Tatonka") Motion for Summary Judgment (# 83), Mr. Connelly's pro se1 response (...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases