1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BAILEY v. VERSO CORPORATION
 

BAILEY v. VERSO CORPORATION

Case No. 3:17-cv-332.

CLIFFORD BAILEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. VERSO CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Dayton.

July 3, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford Bailey, James Spencer & United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC, Plaintiffs, represented by David M. Cook , Cook & Logothetis, LLC, Bennett P. Allen , Cook & Logothetis, LLC, John G. Adam , Legghio & Israel, P.C., pro hac vice, Maneesh Sharma , pro hac vice & Stuart M. Israel , Martens, Ice, Klass, Legghio & Israel P.C.

Verso Corporation, Defendant, represented by Curtis G. Moore , Fisher & Phillips, LLP & Steven Mark Loewengart , Fisher & Phillips.

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S RULE 56(d) MOTION; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION (DOC. 29) WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING; (3) SETTING A BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; AND (4) VACATING THE JULY 5, 2018 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases