OPROMOLLO v. MANDALAY CORP.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01409-VCF.

PAUL OPROMOLLO, an individual; Plaintiff, v. MANDALAY CORP. d/b/a MANDALAY BAY RESORT AND CASINO; DOES 1 through 10 inclusive; ROES CORPORATIONS/ENTITIES 1 through 10 inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

June 20, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Opromollo, Plaintiff, represented by Maile Lani Esteban-Trinidad , The Thater Law Group, P.C.

Mandalay Corp., doing business as Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino, Defendant, represented by Patrick H. Hicks , Littler Mendelson, PC & Z. Kathryn Branson , Littler Mendelson.


STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiff PAUL OPROMOLLO ("Plaintiff") and Defendant MANDALAY CORP. d/b/a MANDALAY BAY RESORT AND CASINO ("Defendant"), by and through...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases