1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MILLER v. AT&T
 

MILLER v. AT&T

Case No. 6:18-cv-6008.

PAUL F. MILLER, Plaintiff, v. AT&T d/b/a SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY; AT&T d/b/a/DIRECTV, LLC; JAMS; and RANDALLS, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division.

June 18, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Cause: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Nature of Suit: 896 Other Statutes: Arbitration
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul F. Miller, Plaintiff, pro se.

AT&T, doing business as Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, also known as AT&T Arkansas, AT&T, doing business as DirecTV LLC. & RANDALLS, Defendants, represented by Amber Prince , Conner & Winters & John M. Scott , Conner & Winters, LLP.

JAMS, Defendant, represented by R. Kenny McCulloch , Barber Law Firm PLLC.

ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed on May 15, 2018, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 32). Judge Bryant recommends that the Court grant Separate Defendants Southwestern Bell Telephone...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases