1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DICKENS v. VICE
 

DICKENS v. VICE

Cause No. 3:17-CV-425-CWR-FKB.

DONALD DICKENS, Plaintiff, v. DONNIE VICE; JAMES, CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LLC; MACK TRUCKS, INC.; PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION; & JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division.

May 30, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Nature of Suit: 365 Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Dickens, Plaintiff, represented by Robert F. Wilkins , MORGAN & MORGAN, PA.

Donnie Vice, Individually and as an Employee of James Construction Group, James Construction Group, LLC & Primoris Services Corporation, Defendants, represented by Arthur D. Spratlin, Jr. , BUTLER SNOW LLP & Margaret Z. Smith , BUTLER SNOW LLP.

Mack Trucks, Inc., Defendant, represented by Bradley B. Vance , BURR & FORMAN, LLP & Maggie Kate Bobo , BURR & FORMAN, LLP.

ORDER

Before the Court is the plaintiff's Rule 56(d) motion.

The legal standard is well-established. See McDougle v. Neshoba Cty., Miss., No. 3:15-CV-350-CWR-FKB, 2016 WL 83785, at *1 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 7, 2016). "Rule 56(d) motions for additional discovery are broadly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases