WESCOTT v. SC ANDERSON, INC.

Case No. 17-cv-05676-LB.

CARL ALEXANDER WESCOTT, Plaintiff, v. SC ANDERSON, INC., HERRIG & VOGT, LLP, and MOE'S PROCESS SERVING, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco Division.

May 21, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cause: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer / Corrupt Organization
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl Alexander Wescott, Plaintiff, pro se.

SC Anderson, Inc. & Herrig & Vogt, LLP, Defendants, represented by Anthony P. Fritz , Herrig and Vogt.

Moe's Process Serving, Inc., Defendant, represented by Keith Daniel Cable , Cable Law.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY

Re: ECF Nos. 22 and 45

INTRODUCTION

Carl Wescott, who is representing himself and proceeding in forma pauperis, sued the defendants, generally claiming that they conspired to fraudulently obtain a default judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases