SUPERIOR CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. v. SHAKLEE CORPORATION

Case No. 6:16-cv-2001-Orl-31GJK.

SUPERIOR CONSULTING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. SHAKLEE CORPORATION and SHAKLEE U.S., LLC, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division.

May 22, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 0044
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 0044 Trademark Infringement
Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Superior Consulting Services, Inc., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, represented by Coleman W. Watson , Watson LLP, Leia Villasenor Leitner , Watson LLP & Ronika Julleen Carter , Watson LLP.

Shaklee Corporation, Defendant, represented by Allison Doucette , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, E. Colin Thompson , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, Ethan Jerome Loeb , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, Jon P. Tasso , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA & Kevin Joseph Healey , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA.

Shaklee U.S., LLC, Defendant, represented by Ethan Jerome Loeb , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA.

Jennifer Steeves-Kiss, Movant, represented by Allison Doucette , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, Jon P. Tasso , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, Robert A. Weikert , Nixon Peabody, LLP, pro hac vice & Ethan Jerome Loeb , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA.

Shaklee Corporation, Counter Claimant, represented by Allison Doucette , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, E. Colin Thompson , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, Ethan Jerome Loeb , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA, Jon P. Tasso , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA & Kevin Joseph Healey , Smolker Bartlett Loeb Hinds & Sheppard, PA.

Superior Consulting Services, Inc., a Florida corporation, Counter Defendant, represented by Coleman W. Watson , Watson LLP, Leia Villasenor Leitner , Watson LLP & Ronika Julleen Carter , Watson LLP.


ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff's Daubert Motion to exclude the expert report of Lloyd Morgenstern (Doc. 213), and the Defendants Response in Opposition (Doc. 232).

I. Factual Background and Procedural History

Superior owns two Florida fictitious business...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases