1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. LENEXA HOTEL, LP v. HOLIDAY HOSPITALITY FRANCHISING, INC.
 

LENEXA HOTEL, LP v. HOLIDAY HOSPITALITY FRANCHISING, INC.

Case No. 15-9196-KHV.

LENEXA HOTEL, LP, Plaintiff, v. HOLIDAY HOSPITALITY FRANCHISING, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Kansas.

April 26, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 196 Contract: Franchise
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lenexa Hotel, LP, Plaintiff, represented by Brennan P. Fagan , Fagan Emert & Davis LLC, James R. Bartimus , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC, Melody R. Dickson , Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP, Thomas P. Cartmell , Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP, Tyler W. Hudson , Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP & William Skepnek , Skepnek Law Firm.

Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc., Defendant, represented by Charles M. Jones, II , Haynes and Boone, LLP, pro hac vice, David A. Jermann , Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Deborah S. Coldwell , Haynes and Boone, LLP, pro hac vice, Kevin W. Prewitt , Armstrong Teasdale LLP & Sally L. Dahlstrom , Haynes and Boone, LLP, pro hac vice.

Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc., Counter Claimant, represented by Charles M. Jones, II , Haynes and Boone, LLP, pro hac vice, David A. Jermann , Armstrong Teasdale LLP, Deborah S. Coldwell , Haynes and Boone, LLP, pro hac vice, Kevin W. Prewitt , Armstrong Teasdale LLP & Sally L. Dahlstrom , Haynes and Boone, LLP, pro hac vice.

Lenexa Hotel, LP & Stephen J. Craig, Counter Defendants, represented by Brennan P. Fagan , Fagan Emert & Davis LLC, James R. Bartimus , Bartimus, Frickleton, Robertson, and Rader, PC, Melody R. Dickson , Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP, Thomas P. Cartmell , Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP, Tyler W. Hudson , Wagstaff & Cartmell, LLP & William Skepnek , Skepnek Law Firm.

ORDER

This action arises from a franchise agreement for a Crowne Plaza hotel in suburban Kansas City. In a complaint filed on August 4, 2015, the plaintiff-franchisee asserted claims against the defendant-franchisor for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases