SINGH v. SYNCHRONY BANK

Case No. 3:16-CV-05740-WHO.

MARCHE SINGH, Plaintiff, v. SYNCHRONY BANK, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

April 17, 2018.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cause: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marche Singh, Plaintiff, represented by Amy Lynn Bennecoff Ginsburg , Kimmel and Silverman PC & Rachel Rebecca Stevens , Kimmel & Silverman, P.C.

Synchrony, formerly known as GE Capital Retail Bank, Defendant, represented by Christine Marie Neuharth , Reed Smith LLP & Raagini Rashmi Shah , Reed Smith LLP.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO ARBITRATE CLAIMS AND DISMISS LAWSUIT

Plaintiff Marche Singh and Synchrony Bank have filed a Stipulation to Arbitrate Claims and Dismiss Lawsuit. Pursuant to the Stipulation, and for GOOD CAUSE shown, the Stipulation is hereby GRANTED....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases